Prince Charles has been slammed following reports that he had a very emotional first meeting with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s daughter Lilibet.
Prince Charles Slammed For Exploiting His Meeting With Lilibet For Personal Gain-‘Stop Using Lilly To Cover Up The Millions…Received In A Carrier Bag From A Qatari’
It is no secret that Lilibet’s appearance in the UK was significant in that it was the first opportunity for Charles and Queen Elizabeth II to meet her. Not only that, but Lilibet also ended up having her birthday celebrations there too.
With that being said, Charles was overtaken by emotion at one point. A source said: “He hadn’t met Lili, his granddaughter, and so to meet her was very emotional, a very, very wonderful thing.”
Nevertheless, the authenticity of this claim has been questioned for the following reasons. First of all, it arrives on the back end of Prince Charles’ Qatar fund scandal.
According to reports, Charles had allegedly received funds from a Qatar politician (Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani) who just so happened to be the country’s former Prime Minister.
And given that there are worries over whether these payments were made in good faith, this should be more of a pressing matter. Secondly, this source is also inconsistent with Charles’ apparent approach to Archie.
Reports have indicated that the person who Harry and Meghan referred to as having reservations about Archie’s skin colour was none other than Charles. While Charles has denied doing this, he did not come across very well on social media.
A certain subset of fans were very critical over his financial behaviour, while others questioned his credibility as a father. One person wrote: “Charles doesn’t have the ability to have any emotions!”
While another person stated: “Stop using Lilly to cover up the millions Charles received in a carrier bag from a Qatari.” It is safe to say that Charles’ timing of the meeting with Lilibet has not gone down very well with the public.
After all, he may have something to answer in light of his financial practices. So there you have it folks. What did you think about this? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.
